Teaching Television Blog

A reflective practitioner case study attempting to teach key aspects of media education through process drama

Creating the First Lesson

Print the article

This entry was posted on 4/8/2006 12:00 AM and is filed under uncategorized.

Creating Lesson One

April 8, 2006

 

I am creating my first process drama lesson today, which is always a bit of a leap.  I’ve come up with concepts, but the hard part is finding a way to make it happen through dramatic activity.  I decided to start with the development of a television show because I think that will get the kids talking about the shows they watch on television, and we’ll have a better starting off point for future lessons.  As I create this lesson, I wonder if having the kids play experts will make any difference in this process?  I want to hear their ideas, but I want them to speak as if they were experts—is this clear in my curriculum?

 

My set up/pretext is a classified ad that the students have responded to.  I thought it would be interesting to use a form of media (print media) to begin the process.  It also sets up the idea that they want to be here—that they have expertise and ideas to share.  I think this role play might also be something that they grow into as they feel more comfortable in the class.

 

My first activity is a fairly simple sound/movement wheel getting them to name their favorite television show—speaking it and coming up with a movement that somehow represents it.  My hunch is that what other people in the group do will be very important to the others, so it won’t necessarily get an “accurate” interpretation of kids’ favorite shows.  But I think it will highlight shared experiences within the group.  I could ask them to come up with different shows, but I don’t want to start off with an activity that puts additional pressure upon the students. 

 

The second activity begins to investigate genre.  I will be bringing in knowledge of various genres—these are all pulled from Kellison’s Producing for TV and Video.  Through introducing these and asking students to give me definitions/examples, I can gauge how much knowledge they have of these different categories—and perhaps which ones they are drawn to.  I then use an image exercise to perform these genres—the students have an opportunity to dramatize the vocabulary & think about it in “real” terms.  I added the part about moving from ‘channel’ to ‘channel’ through images because I think it will highlight the differences/similarities between genres.

 

The third and final activity involves a discussion reflecting on the day's work.  I want to bring it to life--how do you do this with discussion/reflection?   

 

It is strange to put this into words.  I am used to lesson plans, but the thought articulated along side them is never there.  I think it will provide me with a way of understanding where my process fails to generate a positive experience for the class—and checking myself to make sure I’m not getting lazy with the curriculum development.

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
    Page: 1 of 1
    • 8/11/2007 5:48 PM jay pecora wrote:
      I love the idea of making your research public like this. I think this is a very original new form of accountability. I strongly suggest you write an article about it, and it's possibilities as a tool for qualitative researchers.

      I wonder, though, why you chose not to use a more formal 'log' style of entry? I mean descriptive language and observer comments and analytic memos. Instead you use the more 'casual' language of a traditional blog.
      Reply to this
      1. 8/15/2007 2:38 AM blue danube wrote:
        Well I for one am glad she's not using a more formal "log" style. Have you ever read a more formal "log" style? I'm sure it can provide great material for an academic journal, but a blog like this makes her experiences so much more accessible to a larger audience. Anyone, especially new teachers who want to incorporate the arts, can tune in to a blog like this. It's great!
        Reply to this
    • 8/13/2007 1:30 PM T wrote:
      It's an interesting concept you've chosen and I'm eager to see how it develops. I appreciate your attention to details as well as your recognition of the need to go where the students take you.

      Looking at the previous comment made about the style you have chosen with this blog, I am curious as to what you see as the purpose of this blog -- are you using it to keep track of your thought processes (a similar technique is used in the field of counseling where student counselors write down word-for-word what happened in a session in one column, their reasons for what they said as well as their reactions to what the client said in a second column, and what they would do differently in the third column)? Is it a tool, as part of being a reflective practitioner, to help you evalulate your work?
      Reply to this
      1. 8/15/2007 8:45 PM graham wrote:
        Yeah, I, too, would be very curious to know more about your selection of format. I'll agree that the blog is much more accessible, but your log, as I understand it, is your data - all of it, as the material and substance from which your conclusions can then be reasoned. I just got linked to this, so I'll assume the proof is in the later entries' pudding, but will this blog be substantive enough to allow for your conclusions to be strongly defended?
        Reply to this
    • 8/15/2007 7:47 PM anon wrote:
      I agree with blue...i'm glad you're not using a more "formal" log style. Yes as far as research and accademia go the formal approach is usually the more accepted, however my issue with formal is that it very often fails to give a true picture of what is happening. By being very transparent in her approach this researcher appears to be asking real questions about the process and seeking to LEARN from it. I for one applaude this and wish more people in accademia would take on this approach instead of talking down to people who are out there in the field doing the work that they philosophize about.
      Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.